Horn Antennas vs Parabolic Reflector Antennas

Understand the differences between horn antennas and parabolic reflector antennas both of which give good levels of gain and directivity at microwave frequencies.

Home » Antennas & Propagation » this page

Horn Antenna Includes:
Horn antenna basics Horn antenna theory & equations Horn antenna vs parabolic reflector

There are many types of antenna that can be used to provide the optimum performance in different situations.

At microwave frequencies, two options that can be used are the parabolic reflector and the horn antenna.

These two antenna can perform very well, giving excellent performance, but as they not only look different, they have different electrical parameters, one type may be more applicable in one situation than another.

Selecting the best antenna type will depend upon the requirements and the overall operating environment. In some areas one type of antenna will be the optimum solution, whereas in other instances the other type will be better.

To enable the best choices to be made, the two antennas are described along with their relative advantages and disadvantages.

Horn Antennas

A horn antenna is a directional antenna that consists of a flared, open-ended waveguide which is shaped like a horn. It is most commonly used at microwave and ultra-high frequencies.

The horn antenna transitions electromagnetic energy from travelling along a waveguide into free space. Without the horn, the abrupt end of a waveguide would cause significant impedance change and this would cause signal reflection and poor radiation efficiency.

Diagram of a horn antenna often used with waveguide feeder to provide a convenient microwave antenna showing the horn forming a pyramid at the end of the waveguide — Microwave horn antenna

The flared shape of the horn gradually increases the surface area over which the signal can propagate, matching the impedance of the waveguide to the impedance of free space. This smooth transition minimizes reflections and allows the majority of the energy to be radiated outward.

The size and shape of the horn's flare determine its directive properties.

Sometimes it may be convenient to use coax to feed the horn antenna. This can be achieved by using a coax to waveguide transition in the feed section of the antenna.

Advantages

Wide Bandwidth: Horn antennas typically offer a broad operational frequency range, making them versatile for applications requiring multiple frequencies.
Simple Design: They have a straightforward structure, which makes them relatively easy to manufacture and integrate into systems.
Low Loss: Horns have minimal dielectric losses since they are typically air-filled or use low-loss materials, leading to high efficiency.
Good Impedance Matching: They can be designed to match well with waveguides, reducing reflections and improving power transfer.
Moderate Gain: Horns provide moderate to high gain (typically 10–20 dBi), suitable for many applications like radar and communication systems.
Rugged and Durable: Their robust construction makes them relatively resistant to environmental factors, making them a good solution for many external uses.
Versatile Radiation Patterns: Different horn designs (e.g., conical, pyramidal, sectoral) allow flexibility in shaping the radiation pattern.

Disadvantages

Limited Gain: Compared to parabolic reflectors, horn antennas generally have lower gain. This can limit their use in applications requiring highly focused beams and high gain levels.
Size at Low Frequencies: At lower frequencies, horn antennas become physically large, making them impractical for some applications.
Narrow Beamwidth Constraints: Achieving very narrow beamwidths is challenging without increasing the size significantly.
Weight and Bulk: Large horns can be heavy and cumbersome, especially for high-gain applications.

Parabolic Reflector Antennas

A parabolic reflector antenna is a high-gain antenna used to transmit and receive high-frequency radio waves. It is comprised of a primary radiating element (the feed antenna) positioned at the focal point of a large, parabolic reflector.

The parabolic shape is crucial to its operation. In transmission, radio waves from the feed antenna are directed toward the reflector. The unique geometry of a parabola ensures that all waves striking the surface are reflected outward in parallel paths, creating a highly focused and directional beam.

The paraboloid reflector shape enables signals to be reflected and remain in phase — The parabolic reflector shape enables the wavefronts to remain in phase

In reception, the process is reversed: incoming parallel radio waves strike the dish, are reflected, and converge at the single focal point where the feed antenna is located, which then collects the signal.

This design concentrates the signal's energy, resulting in a very narrow beamwidth and high gain, which makes it ideal for long-distance communication links like satellite TV, radar, and radio astronomy.

Advantages

High Gain: Parabolic reflectors can achieve very high gain (20–40 dBi or more), making them ideal for long-distance communication, satellite links, and radio astronomy.
Narrow Beamwidth: They produce highly focused beams, which are excellent for point-to-point communication and high-directivity applications.
Efficient Use of Aperture: The parabolic shape ensures efficient use of the antenna aperture, maximizing gain for a given size.
Scalability: Larger reflectors can be designed for higher gain without significantly altering the feed system.
Versatile Feed Systems: They can be paired with various feed types (e.g., horn, dipole, or Cassegrain feeds) to optimize performance.

Disadvantages

Narrow Bandwidth: Parabolic reflectors typically have a narrower bandwidth compared to horn antennas, limiting their use in multi-frequency applications. The bandwidth is mainly limited by the actual radiating / receiving antenna element at the focus of the reflector.
Complex Design and Alignment: The feed system must be precisely aligned with the reflector’s focal point, which can complicate manufacturing and installation.
Susceptibility to Blockage: The feed or support structures can block part of the reflector, reducing efficiency (especially in prime-focus designs).
Environmental Sensitivity: Large reflectors are more susceptible to wind loading and deformation, requiring robust mechanical support.
Cost: High-gain parabolic antennas can be expensive to manufacture and install due to their size and precision requirements.

Comparison Summary

Gain and Directivity: Parabolic reflectors excel in high-gain, narrow-beam applications (e.g., satellite communication), while horn antennas are better for moderate gain and wider beamwidths.
Bandwidth: Horns are preferred for wideband applications, while parabolic reflectors are more suited to narrowband, high-frequency systems.
Size and Practicality: Horns are simpler and more compact at higher frequencies but become impractical at lower frequencies. Parabolic reflectors are larger but scale better for high-gain needs.
Cost and Complexity: Horns are generally cheaper and easier to build, while parabolic reflectors require precise engineering, increasing cost and complexity.
Applications: Horns are common in radar, short-range communication, and as feeds for parabolic reflectors. Parabolic reflectors dominate in long-distance communication, satellite systems, and radio telescopes.